Identifying Livelihood Interventions for Family of Hope (PKH) Families

Coordinator:
Team Member: Ana Rosidha Tamyis, Dyan Widyaningsih, Gema Satria Mayang Sedyadi, Fatin Nuha Astini, Jimmy Daniel Berlianto Oley, Nila Warda, Michelle Andrina, Muhammad Adi Rahman, Akhmad Ramadhan Fatah, Hafiz Arfyanto, Veto Tyas Indrio, Ridho Al Izzati
Completion Year:
2019
Area:
Jawa Tengah, Jawa Timur
Topic:
Labor, Migration & Informal Sector, Poverty & Inequality, Social Protection

Collaborating Partners

Project Donor/Funder: Cardno (through MAHKOTA Program) - DFAT

Project Counterpart: TNP2K

 
 

Description & Progress

Background

For the purposes of this study social protection is defined as regular and predictable cash transfers that protect citizens against risk and promote human capital development. Access to cash transfers can also positively impact productivity and access to employment. However, evidence also reflects that, on their own, cash transfers may not be enough to systematically overcome structural barriers to employment and livelihoods. As such, many countries around the world link cash transfers with a range of complementary inputs to improve access to income-generating opportunities, often referred to as ‘cash plus’ or ‘graduation’ programs.

Such schemes often combine cash transfers with livelihood inputs, which can include inputs for micro-enterprises, linkages to markets and/or jobs, capacity building to strengthen livelihood skills and knowledge, among other services. Cash transfers supported with such complementary inputs are more likely to enable working age members within poor and vulnerable households to overcome social and economic barriers to labour supply and demand, provide them with an enabling environment to productively engage, and augment income more than cash transfers alone. Indonesia has vibrant social protection sector and a myriad of employment programs (e.g. vocational training, micro-enterprise schemes, cooperatives, etc).

Given this context, there is considerable potential to formalise linkages between the two and ensure that cash transfer recipients have access to complementary livelihood interventions that are suited to their preferences and needs. Despite the potential, such linkages have been limited. Although there are several government-led employment programs that exist at the local and national level, there is a knowledge gap on whether such schemes respond to the employment needs of the forty percent poorest families receiving social protection programs.

Furthermore, there are no coordination mechanisms among ministries implementing social protection and those implementing employment programs. There is also the potential in Indonesia to strengthen the labour productivity of poor families by providing them with opportunities to enhance existing traditional livelihoods. For example, in Peru’s national ‘cash plus’ program, Haku Winay, working age members within social assistance households are given access to technical inputs so that they can improve farming practices and improve their yield/profitability. Other similar programs – such as in Bangladesh and Lao PDR - also provide technical assistance to improve animal husbandry techniques, enabling poor families to meet the demands of local cattle and livestock buyers, thereby improving household income.

One of MAHKOTA’s end of program outcomes is to ‘increase incomes for the poor and vulnerable’. As a contribution to this outcome, MAHKOTA intends to assess how to improve access to livelihood opportunities, specifically for PKH beneficiary households. Consultations with relevant GOI partners have highlighted that improving livelihood opportunities for PKH households is a current GOI priority. MAHKOTA is therefore seeking to recruit a qualified firm to conduct this study.

Objective

The objective of this study is todevelop concrete recommendations on suitable livelihood opportunities for PKH recipient families, as well as the institutional arrangements and delivery systems to ensure PKH families can access these opportunities.

These recommendations should be developed based on grounded fieldwork, and will be utilised as an input to the design of a ‘cash plus’ or ‘graduation’ pilot program.

To achieve these objectives, the study will specifically:

  1. Analyse the demand for employment among PKH households in selected urban, peri-urban, coastal, and rural areas, as well as the capacity of the household members of the PKH families in accessing existing employment opportunities;
  2. Map and analyse employment and business opportunities that are currently being implemented by national, provincial and district governments, as well as private and nongovernment organizations within the specified geographic locations;
  3. Analyse barriers in connecting PHK families with existing employment and business opportunities and identify ways to link existing livelihoods with PKH working age members; and
  4. Develop recommendations on possible institutional arrangements and delivery systems to link the PKH families with the existing livelihood improvement opportunities

Methodology

This study will adopt a mix of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Both approaches will be combined to complement each other. The qualitative method will be performed through indepth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), observation, and document reviews. The quantitative method to be used will consist of analysis of primary data to be collected through household (HH) survey and relevant secondary data.